AI Security
The Best Physical Security Companies
& Why They're Failing You

The Truth Behind 'Top' Security Companies in 2025 And Why They're Failing to Protect You

Every year, new rankings appear highlighting the “best” security companies in the industry. These lists usually feature the biggest guard firms, the most established alarm companies, and the camera manufacturers with the largest market share. On paper, the industry has never looked stronger. Budgets are increasing, technology is becoming more widely available, and businesses are investing record amounts in physical protection.

Yet many organisations still find themselves dealing with the exact same challenges they faced years ago. Construction companies continue to lose materials to theft. Carparks and logistics yards struggle with intrusions. Remote sites remain vulnerable, particularly during night hours. Even with more cameras, more guards, and more monitoring centres than ever before, many clients feel that actual protection has not improved at the pace they expected.

This disconnect exists because although the world of security has changed dramatically, many of the companies that dominate traditional rankings have not evolved their approach in any meaningful way.

Where traditional security companies are beginning to fall short

Guard centric models

For decades, security relied heavily on manpower. While guards still play an important role, the reality is that human based models face well known limitations. Long shifts, fatigue, distraction and high turnover all affect performance, especially on large or complex sites. Even with the best training, it is difficult for a single guard to maintain full situational awareness across wide areas or respond instantly to every irregular event. Clients often end up paying for more headcount without seeing proportional improvements in protection.

Alarm and monitoring companies

Many traditional alarm systems were designed around motion triggers and basic sensors. These alerts cannot distinguish between genuine threats and harmless activity such as wildlife, weather changes or environmental movement. As a result, control rooms receive enormous volumes of alerts that have no real value. Industry studies often show false alarm rates above ninety percent, which slows down response times and makes it harder for teams to focus on actual incidents.

Camera only vendors

Although video cameras are essential, a camera by itself does not understand what it is recording. Most camera only providers still depend on motion based alerts or require clients to review footage manually after an incident has already taken place. This means the system offers visibility but not necessarily prevention, and the responsibility for identifying threats is pushed back onto the client or a monitoring centre that must deal with high volumes of irrelevant triggers.

Taken together, these models create a situation where businesses are buying more equipment and services, but not always achieving more security.

Why these approaches are failing to keep up in 2025

Sites have become larger, risks evolve more quickly, projects run on tighter margins, and expectations for real time response have increased. Traditional providers rely on static hardware or human response, both of which struggle to scale across multiple locations or maintain consistent performance twenty four hours a day. High false alarm volume wastes resources and delays action. Outdated detection methods miss early warning signs that AI can easily identify. Most importantly, many legacy systems react to problems rather than preventing them.

This is why so many businesses feel they are spending more money on security than ever before while still facing interruptions, losses or operational delays.

How ImageDeep takes a fundamentally different approach

At ImageDeep, we believe physical security should be intelligent, adaptive and proactive. Instead of relying solely on guards or on cameras that record after the fact, we build systems that detect unusual activity early, verify it quickly, and support an immediate response.

AI enabled detection

Our AI models analyse behaviour rather than simple movement, which means the system can identify people, vehicles and unusual activity with a level of context that traditional cameras cannot achieve. This reduces meaningless alerts and ensures that attention is placed on events that genuinely require action.

Human verification for every alert

Every alert our AI identifies is verified by trained specialists in our monitoring hub. By combining machine intelligence with human judgement, clients receive accurate, verified information instead of streams of unfiltered motion notifications. This significantly improves response times and ensures that the right decisions are made when something important is happening.

Smarter hardware and mobile deployment

Products such as SentryPal Pro are designed for environments where rapid deployment, autonomy and reliability are essential. These systems provide full site coverage without requiring large teams of guards and can be placed even in locations with limited infrastructure. When intelligence is built directly into the hardware, protection becomes more consistent and scalable.

Compatible with existing CCTV systems

Instead of forcing clients to replace their entire camera network, ImageDeep integrates with many existing systems, which reduces cost and speeds up implementation. We help clients modernise without disrupting their operations.

Real cost efficiency

By reducing the need for on site guards, lowering false alarm rates and improving the accuracy of detection, clients achieve significantly better protection while managing long term costs more effectively.

Essential questions every organisation should ask their security provider

To understand whether a security provider is prepared for today’s challenges, clients should ask a few key questions.

How many of your alerts are verified?

A provider should be able to give clear answers about accuracy and verification processes.

How fast do you detect and escalate incidents?

If most events are discovered after they happen, the system is not providing real protection.

Can your technology adapt to changing site conditions?

Construction sites, logistics yards and remote facilities require flexible systems that evolve as the environment changes.

Do you reduce guard dependency or increase it?

Modern security should optimise manpower, not rely on it as the primary solution.

Can your platform integrate with my current cameras and systems?

Replacing equipment unnecessarily increases cost and slows adoption.

Recognised security brands and large guard companies have built their reputations over decades, but reputation alone does not guarantee performance in a world where risks and technologies are changing quickly. Clients need partners who think ahead, who can deploy new tools rapidly, and who understand that real protection requires a blend of intelligence, verification and responsiveness.

This is the standard ImageDeep works toward every day.

If your organisation is looking to strengthen site protection, reduce risk and modernise your security infrastructure, our team is ready to help you take the next step. Talk to ImageDeep and discover a smarter way to protect your sites.